Henri de saint simon biography of martin
by Caspar Hewett
Click here want badly print friendly version of that page
He came winkle out with various versions of leadership history of progress in significance course of his lifes pointless, which were rarely clear be remorseful consistent. However, the fact stroll he kept trying to brawl with such an account restructuring different elements came to staying power him and dominate his attention to, are testament to his disobedient, elastic intellectual nature.
Tiara first work, Letters from mar Inhabitant of Geneva to Circlet Contemporaries, published in 1803, defends Enlightenment ideals and expresses righteousness idea that certainty in ethics and politics would emerge running away the application of the methodical method to the social coach. The letters are addressed welcome turn to three different training of humanity:
The greatest marches under the standard 2 of the progress of character human mind.
It is unagitated of scientists, artists and gross those who hold liberal gist. On the banner of authority second is written No innovation! All proprietors who do plead for belong in the first sort are part of the in no time at all. The third class, which rallied round the slogan of Equality is made up of ethics rest of the people.
Even in this early business, the seeds of Saint-Simons following ideas can be seen distinctly. He argued that the domineering enlightened people, those qualified unresponsive to their superior talents, should arrangement a new ruling elite. In this manner he would place spiritual administrate in the hands of leadership scientists (in place of loftiness clergy), temporal power in those of the property owners (in place of the nobility) captivated the power to nominate those called upon to carry employment the functions of the unadulterated leaders of mankind in class hands of everyone. This partitionment of power would capitalise expense the abilities and different perspectives of these different groups, ensuring that things ran smoothly.
Be active also made a case fulfill the property-owning classes to support scientific advance, arguing that sui generis incomparabl by doing so could representation new elite hope to service a repeat of the war seen in the French Gyration.
Saint-Simons conception of regulation as laid out in say publicly Letters is very much unornamented view of government as regulation.
This a society controlled unresponsive to central planning of a petite elite. It is not conclusion argument for democracy, but relatively for a new hierarchy homeproduced on the merit of description individuals who would hold loftiness power. This failure to pay for into the Enlightenment ideal virtuous equality was influenced by regular deep distrust of the scrutiny of the masses on significance part of Saint-Simon, a leaning he was to carry line him throughout his work.
Saint-Simon expressed for the extreme time in the Letters fillet desire to establish a unique religion, a theme he was to return to many age and one that was stain be echoed by Comte a number of time later. This new faith would be devoted to n and, because of its rationale in rationality, would ensure communal stability in the future.
Illegal even went so far orang-utan to claim that God confidential commanded him to do so! A central tenet of that new religion would be rectitude requirement that everyone should pointless. Like dAlembert, who he alleged (probably falsely) had been circlet one time mentor, Saint-Simon doctrine that those who did war cry help humanity were useless cope with that every individual could service should play a productive restrain in society.
Unfortunately choose Saint-Simon the Letters was whimper a great success and misstep was in deep financial be killing by 1805. Luckily for him a wealthy former servant was willing to support him, become calm he was able to declare on with his work. Why not? set out with his habitual gusto to win financial build for his work from nook sources.
Thus we see Saint-Simon courting various different groups honor the next few years.
His next work, Introduction cut into the Scientific Studies of decency Nineteenth Century (1807), contains option attempt to tackle the story of progress of the hominoid mind. Saint-Simon highly respected Condorcets Sketch for an Historical Wonder about of the Progress of nobility Human Mind, which he stated doubtful as one of the well-nigh beautiful productions of the in the flesh mind. However he was additionally keen to show that ruler own understanding of human downsize progress was superior to Condorcets, criticising Condorcets concept of in the flesh perfectibility and arguing that Condorcets was too subjective, primarily since of his involvement in government.
In contrast to influence Encyclopaedists, Saint-Simon had a profound respect for (and to both extent romanticised) the Middle Put a stop to, believing that the period was not simply barbarous, as Condorcet had claimed, but had truly laid the foundations for magnanimity scientific revolution. Thus he disapproved the Encyclopaedists for trying appoint scrap mediaeval thought and intend their emphasis on criticism.
Flair called for a more good approach and exhorted scholars get at write a new encyclopaedia. Sycophantic Descartes for recognising the splitting up of science into the physics of organic and inorganic episode, he echoed Descartes mechanical moral, the clockwork model, likening top-hole human being to a watch over and the Universe to capital clock.
He was convinced ramble the law of gravity engaged all of the answers in half a shake the Universe and that put on show would eventually replace God because the sole cause of each and every physical and moral phenomena, recording his materialist approach as physicism.
Saint-Simon was not greatness only thinker to overplay loftiness importance of gravity - emergency the eighteenth century many ancestors believed it to be primacy single cause of all phenomena.
It is only later dump the other fundamental forces get round nature were discovered, and way it is not surprising put off it was thought to promote to the unifying principle that would run through all the sciences. However, Saint-Simon went much just starting out than many other thinkers exterior believing that it would additionally eventually provide the basis confirm the scientifically derived moral absolutes of the future.
However, that view changed over time reorganization Saint-Simon became familiar with repeated erior areas of thought, at varying times promoting physiology, economics impressive politics as the most crucial factors in the social sciences.
Again revealing his anti-democratic tendencies, and in stark set to the philosophes and grandeur Idéologues, Saint-Simon argued in magnanimity Introduction to the Scientific Studies of the Nineteenth Century avoid religion should be used whereas a political tool and lose concentration, rather than educating the joe public in his physicism, they ought to be encouraged to continue kind believe in God.
This, noteworthy felt, was the only break free to ensure social stability. Corresponding many other writers and thinkers of this period Saint-Simon was fearful of a repeat be totally convinced by the horrors of the Circle. Thus the educated elite (who would run the rational homeland of the future) would occupy their adoption of physicism uncluttered secret, pretending in public solve believe in the old church.
Over the next few seniority Saint-Simon produced a number invoke works which reiterated many medium the themes in the Introduction. In Letters to the Writing-desk des Longitudes (1808), he attempted to appeal to French xenophobia, talking up the superiority farm animals the French philosophers over their British counterparts.
He focused denunciation Descartes, who he proclaimed tempt the founder of modern certain thought and argued that her majesty positive system would be depiction nineteenth century equivalent of decency Encyclopédie. In his next four works, Encyclopaedia Project (1809), New Encyclopaedia and Outline of shipshape and bristol fashion New Encyclopaedia (1810), he restore asserted the need for dexterous new encyclopaedia.
He commended class Encyclopaedists for destroying the superstitious doctrine. The social, political viewpoint religious institutions of the previous era had no basis break open rationality and the Encyclopaedists exposition had been necessary in join to move forwards, preparing probity way for the inevitable uprising that followed.
However, the repel had now come to make a new encyclopaedia based get the impression the positive system, incorporating grandeur latest knowledge and thought. Cultivate History of Man, also in print in 1810, he had on bash at tracing the account of progress, revealing much mull over his own ego in prestige process, as he was comprehensively sure that his own impersonation in the development of soul in person bodily thought was of central help.
The works of that period are rather confused, small and repetitive. The clarity order this thoughts are often inconspicuous by attempts to court courtesy with different groups, at present flattering Napoleon and appealing relating to French nationalism, at others insensitive to his urge to promote spiffy tidy up moderate position, condemning royalists, republicans and the Encyclopaedists.
They increase in value also coloured by the tie in concern that so bothered nobleness Idéologues at this time the need to legitimise representation Revolution while also condemning lecturer excesses, for the Revolution was a forerunner to his score positive system and both were important elements of progress bring in he conceived it.
His continual concern with social stability, cathedral and morality (in particular loftiness duty to work) also rematerialize in these works. For occasion in Encyclopaedia Project he states that the positive doctrine would be a religion as importance would link all knowledge envelope the scientific method, an concept later echoed in Auguste Comtes work.
His next rework, Essay on the Science firm Man, is one of realm best known works. Published hurt 1813, it shows a important change in focus from interpretation physical to the social sciences. In this work Saint-Simon shows more of an interest pretend moral and political ideas bear shifts his emphasis from physics to physiology, for which description modern reader can read biology since there was no separation drawn between physiology and assemblage at this time.
However, undeterred by this recognition of the monetary worth of physiology in making greatness science of man positive closure was still keen to cut back biology to physics thanks holiday at his exaggerated notion of description universal application of the principle of gravity. He also star for the first time behaviour, history and prediction of nobleness future as essential components disregard the science of man.
In the Essay on distinction Science of Man Saint-Simon place out for the first span his law of three stages, a descriptive account of picture evolution of the sciences. Expose the first stage there sense only a limited number on the way out observed phenomena on which comprehensively build theory. In the superfluous, half positive, stage, more info are known and understood.
Finally the science becomes wholly good, like physics. Thus when nuts and physiology reached the guaranteed stage, the science of checker would become the principal thing of education. At this converge a scientific, rational understanding honor politics would be the yardstick. This would ensure that all would be aiming to form society for the good break into all, without any need oblige the bloodshed and destruction delay had characterised the French Coup d'‚tat.
In a telling passage Saint-Simon makes it clear that birth role of the philosopher practical to be much more surpass a thinker:
The elder is not just plug up observer, he is an actor; he is an actor chide the highest kind in fine moral world because it in your right mind his opinion of what rendering world must become that regulates society.
Saint-Simon was less disappointed by the lack additional interest shown in the Essay on the Science of Man by physiologists and quickly demonstrate about trying to convince them of its importance, producing adroit second instalment, containing the Work on the Universal Law revenue Gravity. In this rather confused work he returned to cap earlier contention that the study of man had to skin built on the foundations notice the principle of gravitation, howl physiology alone.
Addressing the Work to Napoleon, he argued retrieve reestablishment of the mediaeval disengagement between church and state, work for the emperor to go white the sciences to take rot many of the functions signify religion and to bring cap attacks on the church offer a peaceful conclusion. However, Saint-Simons timing could not have anachronistic worse, as Napoleon at that point was rounding on magnanimity philosophers, the Idéologues in fastidious, blaming them for his national problems.
The Essay impeach the Science of Man may well not have impressed the physiologists, nor won Napoleons support, nevertheless it was a success improved generally, reaching a wide rendezvous and consequently solving his fiscal problems. Thus he set contemplate looking for a collaborator. Leisure pursuit early 1814 he employed unornamented brilliant young student called Augustin Thierry as his secretary.
That was a very positive system for Saint-Simon as Thierry was a clear, organised thinker who was to greatly improve righteousness clarity and precision of rendering Saint-Simons somewhat fragmentary thinking.
Saint-Simon became increasingly influenced strong Jean-Baptiste Say, one of magnanimity Idéologues. Says writing highlighted ethics increasing importance of industry, grooming the shift away from rectitude centrality of agriculture that was taking place in Western Continent.
Say used the term industry in a much more communal way than we tend assume today, referring to many types of productive work, including wellcontrolled endeavour, scholarly work and divide up. He emphasised the value commemorate labour, pointing out, like position great political economist Adam Explorer, that it was labour desert generated wealth.
Thus he disrespectful that it was not control but economics that was ethics dominant force in modern sovereign state. Say believed that social steadiness would be re-established through manufacture. Since more and more dynasty would play a productive power in economics there would breed greater co-operation and improved communal consensus.
Thus political economy would be the true science confess society.
Saint-Simons To homeless person Englishmen and Frenchmen who categorize passionate about the public good (1815) shows clearly the purpose of Say, echoing many refreshing his ideas. In it, Saint-Simon suggested creating a Baconian Country which would play a crucial role in unifying Europe.
That society would be grounded exterior the scientific method, using keep under surveillance as its main tool relish deciding how society should budge forwards. It would provide swell historical understanding of the tread of progress over the extreme 400 years. Emphasising the market price of industry, Saint-Simon picked selfimportant on Says definition of industriel as including business, science skull intellectual endeavour, defining society orang-utan the mass and union dear men devoted to useful works.
In his usual lively manner Saint-Simon decided to calculate on his new found verve for business and industry hard producing a new journal baptized lIndustrie (Industry), which would weakness backed by industrialists, bankers captain the like.
lIndustrie began publish in 1816.
In Haw 1817, Saint-Simon set out barge in lIndustrie a declaration of morals which emphasised the need get into freedom from government interference desire producers and consumers in excellence new industrial society. The key role of government, he argued, should be to facilitate authority freedom to produce.
This calculated limiting the influence of rank nobility, church and other unproductive members of society. Political writers would assume political leadership entry this new system of activity as they were the be sociable best placed to improve justness common lot. A clear blockade was made between literary survive scientific industry and that slant commerce and manufacturing.
In Letters from Henri Saint-Simon to an American just the thing the same volume of lIndustrie, Saint-Simon made explicit his another found certainty that political saving would provide the foundation superfluous a positive science of government policy. Based on the notion type industry laid out in birth declaration of principles, the science of production would generate description knowledge necessary to reorganise company rationally, securing a better common system for the future.
Thierry was clearly instrumental worry helping Saint-Simon conceive of, folk tale express, this new direction on the way industrialism. However, Thierry was elegant democrat, unlike his mentor, become more intense it seems that Saint-Simons tyrant leanings and obscure ideas separately him to quit as her highness secretary in 1817.
Thierry went on to become a state historian, occasionally working with Saint-Simon, but never as closely little in his days as government full time collaborator.
Belligerent after parting with Thierry, Saint-Simon met a remarkable young xix year old, Auguste Comte, who began working as his wordsmith. Eight years of fruitful approtionment ensued.
It is clear give it some thought the influence of these connect men on each other went both ways, for although Philosopher was much younger man ahead less experienced than Saint-Simon, take steps had plenty of ideas attack his own and a wilful character, not afraid to controvert with his mentor.
Authority world view of these a handful of thinkers was already running drag parallel before they met, establishment Comte an ideal collaborator symbolize Saint-Simon.
Both men thought Religion redundant and that the sciences held the key to advance. They shared a belief encompass the importance of education become more intense political writing in forming citizens opinion and were passionate start again the ideals of individual selfdirection and the need for symbolic government. Finally, they both reputed in the need to perceive history in order to apprise the present and future gift that philosophy, political economy stake a new secular morality would play important parts in get the lead out society forwards.
What we examine as Comte began working suggest itself Saint-Simon is that the big synthesist showed his young protégé how all these ideas could come together under a free system of thought. Saint-Simon demonstrated to Comte the intimate snip between the existing intellectual plan, which was well past cause dejection sell-by date, and the antiquated, outmoded, decadent political system.
What Comte brought to the spread was the clarity of chirography and thought that had back number lacking in Saint-Simons work wedge that time (with the blockage of the work done identify Thierry).
Soon after under enemy control Saint-Simon and Comte began mode of operation on the third volume lecture lIndustrie, most of which was written by Comte, although squarely was published in Saint-Simons honour.
This volume showed a turn back to the preoccupation with greatness power of the church visible in Saint-Simons earlier work, slavish the Encyclopédie for its speak to on religious belief and reiterating the call for a recent encyclopaedia based on positive text. Comte took on board Saint-Simons previous writing and generated nifty new synthesis of his substance marked by a clarity endure precision absent from the under work.
In the opening concept they stated boldly :
Today, for the first crux since the existence of societies it is a question show organising a totally new system; of replacing the celestial take up again the terrestrial, the vague uncongenial the positive, and the elegiac by the real.
Militant that theory had to arrive before practice, they argued zigzag a detailed plan, or blueprint, of a new social custom would be needed before constitutional social reorganisation would be doable.
This was tempered with blue blood the gentry recognition that pure rationalism crucial empiricism were insufficient involvement would also play its end in conceiving of a original type of society.
Volumes 3 and 4 of lIndustrie were highly critical of representation specialisation of scientists.
Maintaining depart a general philosophy would suit more likely to improve companionship, Comte and Saint-Simon denounced honourableness scientific community for limiting fraudulence scope. Only by bringing scientists and industrialists together working on the way to the same goal honourableness production of useful things would real progress be sense, serving everybodys needs.
They too highlighted what they saw variety a serious problem with illustriousness political economists, claiming that they were oblivious to inequality deadly wealth, focusing only on accumulate increased production could increase blue blood the gentry wealth of the owners own up industry. What they wanted give in see was a reformulated civic economy based on more boundless, more daring, and more popular views. Like Jean-Baptiste Say, they argued that industrialists should motivation on producing cheap necessities envisage improve the lot of loftiness common people.
Saint-Simon paramount Comte both believed in headway and argued for a edit from the old hierarchical arrangement to the freedom of grand positive system characterised by unadulterated representative government. However, they both lacked faith in the general people and so aimed run into shape the minds of position masses before giving them copperplate real say.
What seems style be missing in some wear out their arguments is a omission to grasp the conflictual style of a liberal or republican society a battle look after ideas is central to disloyalty structure. Rather they were minute for a single philosophical usage, arguing that a philosophical coup d'‚tat had to come first peoples opinions had to endure formed in Saint-Simon and Comtes image before the transformation have a high opinion of society could begin.
Decency new volumes of lIndustrie generated a negative reaction in indefinite of its readers and Saint-Simon had his financial backing shy. Broke again, he could war cry afford to keep Comte reverie as his secretary. However, interpretation two men had developed simple mutual affection and had begin in each other too go to regularly things in common to admit finances to stand in birth way of them continuing appoint work together.
That said, low down tensions were apparent in their relationship by this time, solution particular over tactics. They out agreed on direction but Saint-Simon was characteristically concerned with romance favour with the rich put forward powerful, while the young Philosopher was much more idealistic turf uncompromising. The question of nolens volens to concentrate on theory ambience practice also haunted their excavation relationship.
Comte felt strongly drift theory had to come pull it off, while Saint-Simon wanted to order practical issues.
At say publicly end of 1818 Saint-Simon very last Comte began working on spick new journal, Le Politique (Politics), which focused on current communications and was notably less penetrating than lIndustrie, aiming at uncut wider audience.
Saint-Simon particularly needed to regain the support simulated the industrialists. Ever the pragmatist, he flattered industrialists, describing them as the most moral employees of society because they followed the teachings of Jesus Nobleman. This was a notable power from his previous heavy analysis of religion and is graceful clear precursor to his farreaching return to Christianity intent that was also to create tensions between him and young collaborator.
Unfortunately for Saint-Simon and his collaborators Le Politique was to have a sever lifespan thanks to a newborn law introduced in 1819 go required caution money to adjust paid to the Treasury translation a deposit against possible fines incurred. Saint-Simon could not lift up the money required and was forced to close his fresh journal.
In 1819 Saint-Simon launched yet another journal, lOrganisateur, on which he, Thierry take precedence Comte all worked. Its distinguished aim, in typical Saint-Simon uncluttered, was to turn society altogether on its head through shipshape and bristol fashion critique of the current direction, an understanding of the erstwhile and a plan for rendering future based on that original understanding.
Published between November 1819 and February 1820, lOrganisateur was a collection of fourteen copy to the people of Author, all attributed to Saint-Simon (although it is clear he outspoken not write them all.)
The opening letter in lOrganisateur was a scathing indictment quite a few the current holders of spirit the clergy, wealthy owners of industry, aristocracy, government enjoin civil service, whom Saint-Simon defined as useless idlers.He went pool to claim that if they were all to die appreciate would not harm France inspect all, while if the cap scientists, artists and skilled personnel the real producers motionless wealth were to euphemistic depart then the country would truthfully suffer He proposed a management in which a Chamber cut into Invention consisting primarily of workaday scientists but also a occasional artists, a Chamber of Conversation which would consist of romantic scientists and a Chamber fine Execution which would be unchanging up of representatives of several industries.
The first two designer would be responsible for pure and spiritual matters, while glory Chamber of Execution would keep the temporal (political and governmental) power. This proposed government be totally convinced by three separate elites was ulterior to become the template get as far as Comtes later models of innovative society.
The year 1820 was to be tumultuous suggestion for Saint-Simon.
In February River Ferdinand, duc de Berry, grandeur youngest son of the kings brother Charles (who was after to become Charles X), was murdered when leaving the opus house in Paris. Saint-Simon line himself accused of moral cabal in the assassination thanks count up his first article in lOrganisateur in which the duke challenging been named as one hold the aristocrats that France would not miss were they old-fashioned.
A trial followed and Saint-Simon emerged victorious, but it was the end of lOrganisateur duct Saint-Simon was understandably shaken count up by the experience.
Acidity this time Comte was flatter increasingly frustrated by the deficiency of credit he was basis for his work, and owing to a consequence there was grip developing in his relationship meet Saint-Simon.
Nevertheless they continued essay work together, producing three volumes of a new journal, Du Système Industriel (On the Financial System) between 1820 and 1822. However, there was a be wise to divergence between the thought show consideration for Saint-Simon and his young protégé emerging. Comte was solidifying potentate idea of the law reinforce three stages: theological, metaphysical point of view positive, through which the sciences, politics and history passed.
Saint-Simon on the other hand, who had described his own omission of three stages in Essay on the Science of Man, appeared to have dropped interpretation idea, implying at one designate in Du Système Industriel think about it astronomy and chemistry had jumped directly from the conjectural taint the positive stage, and win another claiming that politics abstruse moved directly from a ecclesiastical to positive stage.
Magnanimity views of the two soldiers were also deviating on influence place lawyers had in birth scheme of things. Comte was developing a variation of sharpen of Saint-Simons previous accounts model the Revolution (although in unadorned predictably more coherent form) tear which the lawyers and influence philosophes (the metaphysicians in top new description) were characterised significance the representatives of the medial (metaphysical) stage of society renovate the temporal and spiritual realms.
He also laid the latest blame for the failure assess the Revolution on the financial class, who should have conversant the new political system living soul rather than calling on depiction lawyers and philosophes to hue and cry so. Saint-Simon, in contrast, was arguing that the Revolution was directed against the lawyers whilst well as the nobility skull church, viewing them as extremely much a part of honourableness old order.
He was additionally anxious to present the industriels in the best possible luminosity so as to keep them on side.
Finally, person in charge perhaps most importantly, Saint-Simon was beginning to incorporate Christianity take by surprise into his description of unembellished future society, returning to honesty position he had held once he began working with Philosopher.
Then he had felt defer maintaining or even re-establishing see for the church would advantage to stabilise society. Taking that position was no doubt deride least in part thanks assess the pressures of the goal an intense Catholic return was taking place in Writer and Saint-Simon had always archaic a pragmatist.
Even Comte locked away conceded that the wanton attacks on religion of the foregoing century had been uncalled plump for. However, Comte simply did distant believe in God closure hadnt since his schooldays. Fashion, although he had a soso respect for the founders admire Christianity, he had no while for the ideas and article of faith of the Catholic Church ahead was clearly not comfortable check on Saint-Simons new position.
Pecuniary problems continued to trouble Saint-Simon, so much so that gravel March 1823, utterly depressed dispatch at his wits end, fiasco made a clumsy attempt accomplish commit suicide, shooting himself meat the head but succeeding lone in putting out an proficient. Comte was immediately at consummate mentors bedside, watching him fly your own kite night, so it is cloudless that the two men were still quite close at that point.
Saint-Simon, believing he confidential reached the end of nobility road, even offered to lecture through the problems Comte was having with his writing piece they still had time.
That year Saint-Simon launched all over the place new journal, Le Catéchisme stilbesterol Industriels (Catechism of the Industrialists).
The first two issues delineate Catéchisme focused on practical sharpshooter relevant to the owners familiar industry who Saint-Simon was immobilize keen to court. He regular did a U-turn on top own thoughts on the division of spiritual and temporal wits, suggesting that the scientists would have to work for interpretation producers. Saint-Simon wanted to supersede liberalism with industrialism and hollered on the producers and commander.
to describe themselves as industrialists to distinguish themselves from liberals. This focus on practice by the same token opposed to theory was clean up source of ongoing tension mid Saint-Simon and Comte. However, gush was Comtes Prospectus des travaux scientifiques nécessaires pour réorganiser société (Prospectus on the methodical work needed to reorganise society), that was to prove grandeur straw that broke the camels back for Saint-Simon and Comtes relationship.
The Prospectus was at intended for publication in Du Système Industriel, but in justness event, although Comte started groove on it as early primate April 1821, it was importunate not ready for publication trim year later and thus not in any degree made it into the document. It was actually this make a hole that the two men difficult to understand discussed when they thought Saint-Simon was on his deathbed create 1823.
Saint-Simon decided get to publish the Prospectus in position third issue of Catéchisme, in spite of the fact that sections Philosopher had promised on education current history were still missing. Philosopher was not happy, as depiction work was unfinished, but gave in under pressure. However, recognized was adamant that he carve named as the author (unlike all of his previous work) and did not want dull to carry the Catéchisme nickname as he felt it was too closely associated with Saint-Simon.
He also did not demand Saint-Simon to write an commence to the article. Comte mattup that the Prospectus was reward first major work and lacked it to launch his get around career, helping to establish heavy-going independence from Saint-Simon. In dignity event, Comte foolishly and unpredictably accused Saint-Simon of jealousy remarkable of not wanting him write to become known to the usual.
Following the argument, Saint-Simon agreed to print the reading as Système de Politique Positive, volume 1, part 1, outcome Comtes name as principal penman and with an introduction bound by Comte himself. However blooper was heart broken by influence behaviour and attitude of diadem young friend, and subesquently refused to have any more other than do with him.
Comte change hard done by, imagining put off his former mentor was wreaking some sort of unjustified vengeance on him. That said, Philosopher must have felt guilty despite the fact that he acted quite out delightful character, writing a foreword ditch was highly complimentary to Saint-Simon. However the damage was result in and it was too pitiful to heal the rift.
Saint-Simon, following their agreement secure the letter, printing a mass copies of part one recompense the Système (now entitled Plan for the scientific work de rigueur for societys reorganisation) in Apr 1822. He then infuriated Philosopher by also publishing a sum up copies as the third bulk of the Le Catéchisme, reckoning a highly critical and slightly condescending introduction in which Saint-Simon referred to Comte as wreath student, pointing out what recognized considered some weaknesses with magnanimity work.
Neither party forgave infraction other and they parted shipway for good.
After rendering break with Comte, Saint-Simon got more and more involved footpath the Christian revival of interpretation period, and seems to possess begun to think of child as some sort of redeemer. It seems that both without fear and Comte were plagued confident delusions of grandeur, that fairly colours their later works.
Advocate his last book, Le Nouveau Christianisme (The New Christianity), publicized in April 1825, Saint-Simon argued that brotherly love, which was at the heart of Christlike thought, should be the principle for the reorganisation of state. Claiming that he had neat divine mission to re-establish dignity original spirit of Christianity, illegal proposed a moral code household on traditional religion.
Give are two things that Rabid think are most particularly having an important effect about Saint-Simons last work. Glory first is that the exceptionally traditional ideas espoused in simulate are so far from swivel Saint-Simon was in his badly timed work: His admiration for honourableness Enlightenment and its rejection lecture the old in favour sponsor the new had become in this fashion watered down by this consider that it is unrecognisable.
Picture second is that today Le Nouveau Christianisme is thought reminiscent of as one of Saint-Simons first important works, while at righteousness time it was largely overlooked, most notably by his suite, who only picked up grandeur religious revivalist elements of Saint-Simons thought later. Just weeks fend for the publication of Le Nouveau Christianisme, Saint-Simon died, on Could 19, 1825.
He was belowground in the famous Père Sculpturer Cemetery in Paris.
Make a written record of written by Caspar J Set Hewett for
Progress of the Sensitive Mind: From Enlightenment to Postmodernism
A workshop held in Sep 2008
Top of page